This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text - The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. Note: Not a valid SPDX expression 'GPL'. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 1806025 bytes in 47 files. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_documentation ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) and/or GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "X11 License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later", "FSF All Permissive License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later and/or MIT License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]". 732 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/survex/licensecheck.txt [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0, /usr/share/gtksourceview-4/language-specs, /usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0/language-specs, /usr/share/gtksourceview-4 [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [!]: Buildroot is not present Note: Invalid buildroot found: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-buildroot See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ [!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file Note: Found : Packager: James Begley Found : Vendor: The Survex Project See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_tags_and_sections [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [ ]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [ ]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 4229120 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. Rpmlint ------- Checking: survex-1.4.17-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm survex-1.4.17-1.fc43.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp9l6fifjz')] checks: 32, packages: 2 survex.spec: E: superfluous-%clean-section survex.src: W: strange-permission survex-1.4.17.tar.gz 666 survex.src: W: strange-permission survex.spec 666 survex.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons survex.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man survex.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 survex.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man7 survex.src: E: spelling-error ('internationalisations', '%description -l en_US internationalisations -> internationalization, interdenominational, institutionalization') survex.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('internationalisations', '%description -l en_US internationalisations -> internationalization, interdenominational, institutionalization') survex.spec:25: W: setup-not-quiet survex.spec:28: E: rpm-buildroot-usage %build [ "%{buildroot}" = "/" ] && echo "buildroot cannot be /" && exit 1 survex.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary 3dtopos survex.spec: W: no-%check-section survex.src: W: invalid-license GPL survex.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL survex.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/survex/COPYING survex.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/vim/compiler/survex.vim survex.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/vim/ftplugin/survex.vim survex.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/vim/syntax/survex-err.vim survex.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/vim/syntax/survex.vim survex.spec:11: W: hardcoded-packager-tag James Begley survex.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gtksourceview-4/language-specs/survex.lang /usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0/language-specs/survex.lang survex.spec:29: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 10 warnings, 2 filtered, 13 badness; has taken 0.7 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: survex-debuginfo-1.4.17-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpucua2q5r')] checks: 32, packages: 1 survex-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 23 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "survex-debuginfo". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "survex". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 2 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://survex.com/software/1.4.17/survex-1.4.17.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : af6e2f70e575a633719cb45fcb6b521bb6c31bf1cb0a1c04be573cdd831e3847 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : af6e2f70e575a633719cb45fcb6b521bb6c31bf1cb0a1c04be573cdd831e3847 Requires -------- survex (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): gdal libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libgdal.so.37()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libproj.so.25()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libwx_baseu-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_core-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_core-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_gl-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_gl-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) proj rtld(GNU_HASH) wxGTK Provides -------- survex: application() application(survex-aven.desktop) mimehandler(application/x-cmap-xyz) mimehandler(application/x-compass-plot) mimehandler(application/x-survex-3d) mimehandler(application/x-survex-pos) mimehandler(application/x-survex-svx) survex survex(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name survex --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-43-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: R, Ocaml, Java, PHP, Perl, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Haskell Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH