This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [ ]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/mise/licensecheck.txt [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled() if unbundling is not possible. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 7445 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: mise-2026.9.1-1.fc46.x86_64.rpm mise-2026.9.1-1.fc46.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpznqquyv6')] checks: 32, packages: 2 mise.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/mise mise.src: W: summary-not-capitalized dev tools, env vars, task runner mise.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized dev tools, env vars, task runner mise.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/mise mise.src: E: spelling-error ('dev', 'Summary(en_US) dev -> deb, derv, div') mise.src: E: spelling-error ('env', 'Summary(en_US) env -> enc, en, envy') mise.src: E: spelling-error ('meez', '%description -l en_US meez -> meet, meed, meek') mise.src: E: spelling-error ('toml', '%description -l en_US toml -> tom, tome, toms') mise.src: E: spelling-error ('dev', '%description -l en_US dev -> deb, derv, div') mise.src: E: spelling-error ('virtualenv', '%description -l en_US virtualenv -> virtual') mise.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('dev', 'Summary(en_US) dev -> deb, derv, div') mise.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('env', 'Summary(en_US) env -> enc, en, envy') mise.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('meez', '%description -l en_US meez -> meet, meed, meek') mise.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('toml', '%description -l en_US toml -> tom, tome, toms') mise.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('dev', '%description -l en_US dev -> deb, derv, div') mise.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('virtualenv', '%description -l en_US virtualenv -> virtual') mise.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mise mise.src: E: no-changelogname-tag mise.x86_64: E: no-changelogname-tag mise.spec: W: no-%check-section mise.src: E: description-line-too-long mise (pronounced "meez") or "mise-en-place" is a development environment setup tool. The name refers to a French culinary phrase that roughly translates to "setup" or "put in place". The idea is that before one begins cooking, they should have all their utensils and ingredients ready to go in their place. mise.src: E: description-line-too-long mise does the same for your projects. Using its mise.toml config file, you'll have a consistent way to setup and interact with your projects no matter what language they're written in. mise.src: E: description-line-too-long mise installs and manages dev tools/runtimes like node, python, or terraform both simplifying installing these tools and allowing you to specify which version of these tools to use in different projects. mise supports hundreds of dev tools. mise.src: E: description-line-too-long mise manages environment variables letting you specify configuration like AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID that may differ between projects. It can also be used to automatically activate a Python virtualenv when entering projects too. mise.src: E: description-line-too-long mise is a task runner that can be used to share common tasks within a project among developers and make things like running tasks on file changes easy. mise.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long mise (pronounced "meez") or "mise-en-place" is a development environment setup tool. The name refers to a French culinary phrase that roughly translates to "setup" or "put in place". The idea is that before one begins cooking, they should have all their utensils and ingredients ready to go in their place. mise.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long mise does the same for your projects. Using its mise.toml config file, you'll have a consistent way to setup and interact with your projects no matter what language they're written in. mise.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long mise installs and manages dev tools/runtimes like node, python, or terraform both simplifying installing these tools and allowing you to specify which version of these tools to use in different projects. mise supports hundreds of dev tools. mise.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long mise manages environment variables letting you specify configuration like AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID that may differ between projects. It can also be used to automatically activate a Python virtualenv when entering projects too. mise.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long mise is a task runner that can be used to share common tasks within a project among developers and make things like running tasks on file changes easy. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 25 errors, 5 warnings, 11 filtered, 25 badness; has taken 3.3 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.10.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 33, packages: 1 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s (none): E: there is no installed rpm "mise". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/jdx/mise/releases/download/v2026.9.1/mise-v2026.9.1-linux-x64-musl.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b13bcd8bc516773fd9b600688ce6e6c01b62071ae57f6aae44be0713a6d834f1 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b13bcd8bc516773fd9b600688ce6e6c01b62071ae57f6aae44be0713a6d834f1 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jdx/mise/v2026.9.1/README.md : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 46127bdcbe0f2056eb1b6b6538bf4be9c5188f3d8352a7bd108719fff12f2af6 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 46127bdcbe0f2056eb1b6b6538bf4be9c5188f3d8352a7bd108719fff12f2af6 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jdx/mise/v2026.9.1/completions/mise.bash : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ae0da351d7b48dc54e810843a3eeafa31579df5502e7f033a65010a0d87dc058 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ae0da351d7b48dc54e810843a3eeafa31579df5502e7f033a65010a0d87dc058 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jdx/mise/v2026.9.1/completions/mise.fish : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b25af38db9a3f5159edc2337f1790e792b63970e52a5a609b5378ffe4e2d61f8 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b25af38db9a3f5159edc2337f1790e792b63970e52a5a609b5378ffe4e2d61f8 Requires -------- mise (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- mise: mise mise(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name mise --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, Perl, Haskell, C/C++, fonts, R, Ocaml, Python, SugarActivity, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH